<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Conversations with Consumers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancynord.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancynord.net</link>
	<description>Commissioner Nancy Nord&#039;s open chat about CPSC efforts to protect consumers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At Least the Wall Street Journal Is Listening by Product Safety: Are We Missing The Point? &#124; Quality Certification Alliance</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2011/03/11/at-least-the-wall-street-journal-is-listening/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Product Safety: Are We Missing The Point? &#124; Quality Certification Alliance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=520#comment-3111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Act (CPSIA) of 2008. Not only has Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Nancy Nord shared her thoughts about a recent Wall Street Journal article, but consumers are also weighing in with articles such [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Act (CPSIA) of 2008. Not only has Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Nancy Nord shared her thoughts about a recent Wall Street Journal article, but consumers are also weighing in with articles such [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: Questionable Certitude by 1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/10/1110-series-questionable-certitude/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1295#comment-3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#171; 1110 Series: Questionable&#160;Certitude [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &laquo; 1110 Series: Questionable&nbsp;Certitude [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: Recordkeeping Harmony or Agony? by 1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/09/1110-series-recordkeeping-harmony-or-agony/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1292#comment-3087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my formal statement on the vote, which delves [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my formal statement on the vote, which delves [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: If We Wanted Your Opinion… by 1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/08/1110-series-if-we-wanted-your-opinion-2/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1289#comment-3086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my formal statement on the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my formal statement on the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: “I certify this is not illegal.” by 1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/07/1110-series-i-certify-this-is-not-illegal/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1280#comment-3085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] proposed amendment to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] proposed amendment to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. Today, I issued my [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: Hiding the Ball? by 1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/06/1110-series-hiding-the-ball/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110: Now It’s Your Turn &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1269#comment-3084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of the Commission’s proposed amendment to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of the Commission’s proposed amendment to its Part 1110 rule on product certifications—hidden costs, confusion on bans and testing exemptions, recordkeeping disharmony, and questions not asked. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: Recordkeeping Harmony or Agony? by 1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/09/1110-series-recordkeeping-harmony-or-agony/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1292#comment-2923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#171; 1110 Series: Recordkeeping Harmony or&#160;Agony? [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &laquo; 1110 Series: Recordkeeping Harmony or&nbsp;Agony? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: If We Wanted Your Opinion… by 1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/08/1110-series-if-we-wanted-your-opinion-2/#comment-2922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1289#comment-2922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created discordant “harmonization” in recordkeeping. Today, I’ll wrap up my thoughts [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created discordant “harmonization” in recordkeeping. Today, I’ll wrap up my thoughts [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: “I certify this is not illegal.” by 1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/07/1110-series-i-certify-this-is-not-illegal/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1280#comment-2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] rule on certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created discordant “harmonization” in recordkeeping. Today, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] rule on certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created discordant “harmonization” in recordkeeping. Today, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1110 Series: Hiding the Ball? by 1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers</title>
		<link>http://nancynord.net/2013/05/06/1110-series-hiding-the-ball/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1110 Series: Questionable Certitude &#124; Conversations with Consumers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynord.net/?p=1269#comment-2919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] shortcomings in proposed changes to Part 1110, our rule on certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] shortcomings in proposed changes to Part 1110, our rule on certificates of compliance: we hid costs, we failed to clarify how certificates intersect bans and testing exemptions, and we created [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
