At Least the Wall Street Journal Is Listening

The Wall Street Journal got it right with this editorial today…


Get the Lead Out, Sir

Nutty test standards give Obama a real chance to help business.

President Obama has been on a campaign to shake his antibusiness reputation, so a good place to start would be to revisit the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, a mess of a law that has put new burdens on small businesses.

In 2008, Congress passed the law in a rush to do something after a scare over lead in toys imported from China. Its problems were quickly apparent, sweeping products from books to bicycles into the dragnet for lead standards. But while businesses pleaded, Democrats stood behind it as a pinnacle of consumer protection while blaming the Consumer Product Safety Commission for any enforcement problems.

The CPSC has done what it can to allay the fiasco of unintended costs and disruptions for small businesses, including staying large portions of the law. But as Commissioner Nancy Nord told House Democrats last year, the language of the bill is drafted in such a way that fixing all the problems is impossible because the “exclusions and exemptions process is not workable.”

Instead of being able to focus energy on products that present real risks to kids, the CPSC’s staff has had to regulate products that pose no harm. The likelihood of a toddler swallowing an all-terrain vehicle, for instance, didn’t stop that product from being swept into the maw.

The law also requires the CPSC to propose the parameters of a third-party lead testing regime, but the issue is so mired in complexity that the commission has yet to set those standards. Under the proposed version of this so-called “15 Month Rule,” Learning Resources Chairman Rick Woldenberg has estimated that supplying multiple testing samples on each of his company’s toys and products will cost his company some $15 million per year.

It gets worse. In August, the lead standard is set to go down to 100 parts per million from the current level of 300 parts per million. Like the earlier step down, the new standard is supposed to be retroactive when it goes into effect, meaning that it will apply to toys and children’s products manufactured before that date, which were perfectly legal when they were made. All five CPSC commissioners have said they don’t believe the new standards should be retroactive when they go into effect this summer.

At a hearing in the House Energy and Commerce Committee in February, California Democrat Henry Waxman defended the law as “necessary to protect kids and families across the country.” We wonder how he figures that, since the incidence of lead poisoning from toys made by domestic manufacturers is nil.

Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton and Subcommittee Chair Mary Bono-Mack have said they will soon introduce a bill that would finally end a regime that has clobbered small businesses with ill-conceived regulations. If Mr. Obama wants to help small business job creation, he could agree that the government doesn’t need to mandate a lead testing protocol for every product known to man.

3 Responses to “At Least the Wall Street Journal Is Listening”

  1. 1 Patricia Bowling March 16, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    Dear Commissioner Nord:

    My husband and I make toys and write books for children. We have been doing this since 1981. We have three children’s books about “Dirty Dingy Daryl” a little boy from Hendyville who loves to build mud castles and play mud football. These books led to the “Dingies” rag dolls we now produce and sell. They are made from new fabric, stuffing and yarn that we purchase from a fabric store. Their clothing is made from new and recycled fabric. Their shoes are purchased in the U.S., but made in China (we have been unable to find a U.S. manufacturer. I assume they are safe since they are actually made for human infants.

    We are concerned on many fronts. My understanding of the CPSIA is that every article that make up our dolls will have to be tested under the current law. Since their clothing is constantly changing–depending on what the fabric store has in stock or what old clothing (such as jeans) that we recycle for their clothing–we will never be able to comply with the law. We do not have the financial resources to comply. In short, we go out of business along with all the other small toymakers and small businesses that deal in children’s products. Secondly, I love “old” things. I am always purchasing vintage children’s toys and books for myself at flea markets, rummage sales and yard sales. To think that our past innovations and creations would be destroyed is a horrific loss. These items are part of Americana.

    The fact that you and Commissioner Northup are standing up for common sense when it comes to the CPSIA is encouraging. We are thankful that you are fighting for the small businesses and consumers like us. Please keep up the good work and please let me know if I can be of assistance to you. We have written to our Senators and Representatives.

    Patricia Bowling (HeBo)
    Halo Toys

  1. 1 Product Safety: Are We Missing The Point? | Quality Certification Alliance Trackback on May 16, 2013 at 1:54 am
  2. 2 Product Safety: Are We Missing The Point? | Compliance Chat Trackback on June 19, 2011 at 5:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 976 other followers


RSS CPSC Breaking News & Recent Recalls

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Let’s keep the conversation going on Twitter. You can find me at @NancyNord.

Nancy's Photos

  • 90,272 visits

%d bloggers like this: